|
|
|
The issue of whether or not a
taxpayer can deduct expenses related to a home-based business is one the
IRS pursues vigorously. It is important to understand when - and
when not - it is appropriate to claim a portion of residential expenses as
"business expenses."
First, the activity must be a
bona-fide business. There are numerous factors that the IRS will
look at to determine if, in fact, the activity meets the definition of a
business and not an "activity not entered into for profit." Section
183 of the Internal Revenue Code specifically deals with these "hobby"
losses.
Second, any area in the home
that is claimed as used for business must meet strict requirements - such
as, it must be used SOLELY for this business activity (no social, sleeping
or other non-business activities can take place in this area), it must be
an area separate and apart from the rest of the property (a separate room
- it cannot be a portion of a large room),
and the list goes on.
The IRS recently issued a
Revenue Ruling advising taxpayers against taking deductions relating to a
home based business that is not genuine - and warns of stiff penalties for
not following its guidance. I have included the text to that ruling
below for your reading.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rev. Rul. 2004-32, 2004-12 IRB, 03/01/2004, IRC Sec(s).
Headnote:
Reference(s):
Full Text:
Purpose
The Service is aware that some taxpayers are attempting to reduce their
federal tax liability by claiming that otherwise nondeductible personal,
living or family expenses are deductible because they relate to a
purported home-based business of the taxpayer that, in fact, is not a bona
fide home business. The purported business in these schemes is no more
than an attempt to create the appearance of having a home-based business
where none actually exists. The Service also is aware that promoters,
including return preparers, are advising or recommending that taxpayers
take frivolous positions based on this argument. Some promoters may be
marketing a package, kit, or other materials, that claim to show taxpayers
how they can avoid paying income taxes based on this and other meritless
arguments. This home-based business scheme and the promotion of this
scheme are described in more detail in this revenue ruling.
This revenue ruling emphasizes to taxpayers, and to promoters and return
preparers who assist taxpayers with home-based business schemes, that they
cannot avoid income tax by claiming otherwise nondeductible personal,
living or family expenses as business deductions that supposedly relate to
a purported home-based business that is not a bona fide trade or business.
This argument has no merit and is frivolous.
The Service is committed to identifying taxpayers who attempt to avoid
their tax obligations by taking frivolous positions. The Service will take
vigorous enforcement action against these taxpayers and against promoters
and return preparers who assist taxpayers in taking these frivolous
positions. Frivolous returns and other similar documents submitted to the
Service are processed through its Frivolous Return Program. As part of
this program, the Service confirms whether taxpayers who take frivolous
positions have filed all of their required tax returns, computes the
correct amount of tax and interest due, and determines whether civil and
criminal penalties should apply. The Service also determines whether civil
or criminal penalties should apply to return preparers, promoters, and
others who assist taxpayers in taking frivolous positions, and recommends
whether a court injunction should be sought to halt such activities. Other
information about frivolous tax positions is available on the Service
website at www.irs.gov.
Discussion Of Home-Based Business Schemes
Several promoters are selling packages of materials (sometimes referred to
as a “Tax Toolbox” or a “Tax Toolkit”) containing video or audio tapes,
workbooks, record-keeping aids, or other materials that the promoters
claim will assist taxpayers in taking tax deductions for a taxpayer's
personal, living or family expenses under the guise of conducting a
business, usually out of the taxpayer's home. The promoters of these
packages typically make one or more of the following claims: (1) taxpayers
can legally reduce or eliminate their federal income taxes by establishing
a business, regardless of whether the business is a bona fide business
conducted for profit; (2) operating a business will permit the deduction
of personal expenses (such as weddings, children's allowances, and
vacations) as legitimate business expenses; (3) placing a calendar, desk,
file cabinet, telephone, or other office-type item in each room of a home
will allow taxpayers to deduct all or most of the costs of operating their
personal residences; or (4) by using the materials that the promoter
sells, taxpayers are guaranteed to receive a large federal income tax
refund or to reduce their federal income tax liability by a substantial
amount.
Whether an individual is carrying on a bona fide trade or business depends
on the facts and circumstances. Nevertheless, the actions taxpayers take
as part of a home-based business scheme, such as the placing of a filing
cabinet in a bedroom, invariably are taken for the purpose of claiming
personal, living or family expenses as deductible business expenses, and
not for the purpose of carrying on a bona fide trade or business.
Home-based business schemes typically are used by taxpayers who perform
all of their work at their employers' place of business.
Section 262 disallows deductions for personal, living or family expenses,
except as otherwise expressly provided by the Internal Revenue Code.
Medical expenses, for example, are deductible only if the specific
requirements of section 213 are satisfied. Similarly, the provisions of
section 163(h) govern when an individual taxpayer may deduct interest on a
mortgage or home equity loan. See I.R.C. §§ 163(h)(2) and (h)(3).
With respect to business expenses, only expenses paid or incurred during
the taxable year in carrying on a trade or business may be deducted under
section 162(a). A trade or business expense deduction under section 162,
however, is not permitted with respect to a taxpayer's residence unless
specifically permitted in limited circumstances by section 280A. I.R.C. §
280A(a). For example, with respect to the business use of a taxpayer's
residence, section 280A provides that in order for allocable expenses to
be deductible under that section, the portion of the taxpayer's residence
must be used exclusively by the taxpayer on a regular basis as a principal
place of business for the taxpayer's trade or business, or to meet or deal
with patients, clients or customers in the normal course of the taxpayer's
trade or business. If the taxpayer is an employee, the exclusive and
regular use of a portion of the taxpayer's residence must be for the
convenience of the taxpayer's employer before any expenses relating to
that part of the taxpayer's residence may be deducted. I.R.C. § 280A(c).
Taxpayers participating in home-based business schemes invariably do not
have a bona fide home-based business and are not using any portion of
their residences exclusively and regularly for a work-related use. These
schemes will not convert otherwise nondeductible personal, living or
family expenses into legitimate deductions. Moreover, detailed
recordkeeping cannot create a permissible deduction unless the expenses at
issue are legitimate business expenses. Although deductions must be
substantiated in order to be allowable, a taxpayer also must establish
entitlement to the deduction, e.g., that the claimed expenses were
ordinary and necessary for the production of income in a trade or
business.
Courts routinely reject the types of arguments made by participants in
home-based business schemes as frivolous and penalize taxpayers who make
these types of arguments. Courts also have enjoined promoters who market
frivolous tax avoidance schemes that utilize these frivolous arguments.
See, e.g., United States v. Estate Preservation Services, 202 F.3d 1093 (9
Cir. 2000) (ordering an injunction against a promoter of a trust scheme
who made fraudulent statements that expenses related to a personal
residence could be deducted if the residence was transferred to a trust);
United States v. Buttorff, 761 F.2d 1056, 1060 (5 Cir. 1985) (ordering an
injunction against a promoter of a trust scheme who made fraudulent
statements that personal consumption expenses could be deducted if
personal property was transferred to a trust); Peete v. Commissioner, T.C.
Memo. 2004-31 (imposing accuracy-related penalty against taxpayer who
deducted personal and living expenses as purported business expenses
related to recruiting participants in a tax avoidance pyramid scheme);
Manley v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1983-558 (disallowing deductions of
claimed personal and living expenses and imposing both an accuracy-related
penalty and a penalty under section 6673 for advancing frivolous
arguments).
Civil And Criminal Penalties
In determining the correct amount of tax, the Service will disallow
personal, living or family expenses that have been improperly claimed as
business deductions. In addition to liability for tax due plus statutory
interest, individuals who claim tax benefits on their returns based on
home-business schemes and other frivolous arguments face substantial civil
and criminal penalties. Potentially applicable civil penalties include:
(1) the section 6662 accuracy-related penalty, which is equal to 20
percent of the amount of taxes the taxpayer should have paid; (2) the
section 6663 penalty for civil fraud, which is equal to 75 percent of the
amount of taxes the taxpayer should have paid; (3) a $500 penalty under
section 6702 for filing a frivolous return; and (4) a penalty of up to
$25,000 under section 6673 if the taxpayer makes frivolous arguments in
the United States Tax Court.
Taxpayers relying on this scheme also may face criminal prosecution for:
(1) attempting to evade or defeat tax under section 7201 for which the
penalty is a fine of up to $100,000 and imprisonment for up to 5 years; or
(2) making false statements on a return under section 7206 for which the
penalty is a fine of up to $100,000 and imprisonment for up to 3 years.
Persons who promote this scheme and those who assist taxpayers in claiming
tax benefits based on this scheme also may face penalties. Potential
penalties include: (1) a $250 penalty for each return prepared by an
income tax return preparer who knew or should have known that the
taxpayer's argument was frivolous (or $1,000 for each return where the
return preparer's actions were willful, intentional or reckless); (2) a
$1,000 penalty under section 6701 for aiding and abetting the
understatement of tax; and (3) criminal prosecution under section 7206 for
which the penalty is a fine of up to $100,000 and imprisonment for up to 3
years for assisting or advising about the preparation of a false return or
other document under the internal revenue laws. Promoters and others who
assist taxpayers in engaging in these schemes also may be enjoined from
doing so under section 7408.
Holding
Taxpayers cannot use schemes designed to create the appearance of having a
home-based business, where none actually exists, for the purpose of
converting otherwise nondeductible personal, living or family expenses
into purportedly legitimate deductions. Arguments that such schemes
generate tax benefits are frivolous. A taxpayer who is not engaged in a
bona fide home-based trade or business cannot deduct, as a trade or
business expense under section 162, any expenses alleged to relate to a
purported home-based business. Taxpayers attempting to reduce their
federal income tax liability by taking frivolous positions will be liable
for the actual tax due plus statutory interest. In addition, the Service
will determine civil penalties against taxpayers where appropriate, and
those taxpayers also may face criminal prosecution. The Service also will
determine appropriate civil penalties against persons who prepare
frivolous returns or promote frivolous positions, and those persons also
may face criminal prosecution. Promoters and others who assist taxpayers
in engaging in these schemes also may be enjoined from doing so under
section 7408.
Even if a taxpayer is engaged in a bona fide trade or business or is
conducting activities from his home for the convenience of his employer,
the taxpayer must satisfy the specific requirements of the Internal
Revenue Code, such as those contained in sections 162 and 280A, to be
entitled to deduct expenses related to those activities. Personal, living
or family expenses are not deductible except as otherwise expressly
provided by the Internal Revenue Code. I.R.C. § 262(a).
Drafting Information
This revenue ruling was authored by the Office of Associate Chief Counsel
(Procedure and Administration), Administrative Provisions and Judicial
Practice Division. For further information regarding this revenue ruling,
contact that office on (202) 622-4910 (not a toll-free call).
|
